|
BETWEEN
|
| |
Lina Sutrisno |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
Torture Claims Appeal Board / |
Putative |
| |
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office |
Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
Director of Immigration |
Putative |
| |
|
Interested Party |
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord 53 r 3)
Following:
Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-Refoulement Claims) Sabrina Ho:
The application for leave to apply for judicial review be dismissed.
Observations for the Applicant:
Introduction
1. By a Form 86 filed on 15 December 2021, the Applicant applied for leave to apply for judicial review against the Decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non‑refoulement Claims Petition Office dated 31 March 2021 (the “Leave Application”).
No Intention to Proceed
2. Upon the Court’s enquiry with the Immigration Department, it transpired that the Applicant has been granted permission to stay in Hong Kong.
3. An oral hearing of the Leave Application took place on 22 January 2026 (the “Hearing”) but the Applicant was not present.
4. Given the Immigration Department’s grant of permission of stay to the Applicant after she takes out the Leave Application, and the Applicant’s absence from the Hearing, I take the view that the Applicant has no intention to proceed with the Leave Application.
5. I therefore dismiss the Leave Application.
Dated the 3rd day of March 2026
| |
(Cheung Ho Yat, Annson)
for Registrar, High Court
|
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Notes for the Applicant:
If leave has been granted, the Applicant or the Applicant’s solicitors must:
|
|
|
|
|
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and
c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
|
|
Sent to the Applicant
on 3/3/2026
Lina Sutrisno
Applicant’s ref. no:
Nil. |
|
Sent to the Putative Respondent / the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 3/3/2026
Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Putative Respondent’s ref. no.:
USM 17325/20/10/74/I1886
Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party’s ref. no.:
QA T/C 385/20 (formerly RBCZ 10332/20)
Department of Justice,
Senior Assistant Law Officer
(Civil Law)
(Civil Litigation Unit 2) |
Form CALL-1