In the Judgment of the above case given by the Court of First Instance on 30 July 2015, the correction reads as follows: -
Page 3, paragraph 6, line 3, adds “in” before “China Minerals”;
Page 5, paragraph 19, line 3, deletes “Claim” and substitutes with “Plan”;
Page 7, paragraph 24, line 2 and 3, deletes “700,000”and substitutes with “750,000”;
Page 10, paragraph 38, line 4, deletes “day to the issue” and substitutes with “day of issue”;
Page 10, paragraph 38, line 5, deletes “ankle” and substitutes with “angle”;
Page 14, paragraph 49, line 5, deletes “7 June 2011 the filing” and substitutes with “7 June and the later filing”;
Page 19, paragraph 68, line 5, deletes “share capital was the” and substitutes with “share capital were the”;
Page 19, paragraph 70, line 6, deletes “in” from “possession in custody”;
Page 24, paragraph 85, line 2, adds “that” after “records” and
Page 34, paragraph 126, line 4, deletes “check” and substitutes with “cheque”.