|
HCA 1951/2018
[2020] HKCFI 639
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO 1951 of 2018
________________________
BETWEEN
| |
DP WORLD DJIBOUTI FZCO |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
DUBAI (INTERNATIONAL) DJIBOUTI FZE |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
DORALEH CONTAINER TERMINAL SA |
3rd Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
CHINA MERCHANTS PORT HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED |
Defendant |
________________________
Before: Hon Mimmie Chan J in Chambers
Date of Written Skeleton Submissions: 23 March, 6 & 14 April 2020
Date of Decision: 23 April 2020
________________________
D E C I S I O N
________________________
1. The Defendant applies for leave to appeal against this Court’s decision dated 20 December 2019, rejecting a stay of these proceedings for determination by the Djibouti Court as the appropriate forum. The grounds are that the Court failed to apply the correct tests or approach in determining the forum conveniens.
2. The Plaintiffs argued that the intended appeal is against an exercise of the discretion of the Court, and parties should not be encouraged to litigate the merits of competing fora at different levels of the court, in the hope of persuading a higher court to strike a different balance in the factors pointing for or against a foreign forum. That is correct, but having considered the draft Notice of Appeal and the submissions of Counsel, I grant the leave sought.
3. I accept that the Defendant has shown that it has more than just an arguable case (Wynn Resorts (Macau) SA v Mong Henry [2009] 5 HKC 515) on the intended appeal, with regard to the issues of the 3rd Plaintiff’s authority to sue, the factors to be considered for the place of commission of the tort complained of by the Plaintiffs, and whether there was error in law, as alleged, in the context of the existence or materiality of public policy considerations. These are complex issues, and the Defendant does not have to establish that its appeal will probably succeed, in order to obtain leave.
4. The summons for leave to appeal is granted, with costs in the cause of the appeal. I also grant the extension of time sought for filing the Defence, as per “Version 1” of the draft order submitted by the Defendant.
| |
(Mimmie Chan) |
| |
Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Mr Paul Shieh SC and Ms Sara Tong, instructed by Deacons, for the 1st to 3rd plaintiffs
Mr Rimsky Yuen, SC, Mr Law Man-Chung and Mr Danny Tang, instructed by Baker & McKenzie, for the defendant
|