MALLARIEVELYN ACOSTA v. CHAN KA PO

DCEC 337/2002

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 337 OF 2002

--------------------

--------------------

______________________

C O  R  R I G E N D U M

______________________

1.    10^th Line, Paragraph 44: ‘…….payments totalling $62,000 and credit must be given for this…….’ should be read as ‘…….payments totalling $68,000 and credit must be given for this…….’

2.    11^th Line, Paragraph 44: ‘..…….under section 10 is $30,930.00.’ should be read as ‘..…….under section 10 is $26,930.00.’

3.    2^nd Line, Paragraph 46: ‘……..$92,634.00.  Interest is awarded……...’ should be read as ‘……..$88,634.00.  Interest is awarded……...’

4.    Paragraph 46, the costs orders should be amended as follows:-

‘The applicant is awarded the costs of the action up to 13^th June 2003 to be taxed if not agreed.  The Respondent is awarded the costs of the action from 13^th June 2003 to be taxed if not agreed.  The applicant’s costs are to be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations.  The costs orders are nisi.’

Dated the 8^th day of November 2004