|
HCA 2534/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO. 2534 OF 2013
____________
|
BETWEEN
|
| |
CHAN LING LING (陳玲玲) |
1st Plaintiff |
| |
CHUA LANA VELASCO (陳麗如) |
2nd Plaintiff |
| |
CHAN KWAN CHIU (陳君超) |
3rd Plaintiff |
|
and
|
| |
CHAN CHING KIT (陳清杰) |
Defendant |
____________
| Before: Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee in Court |
| Dates of Hearing: 10-13, 16, 20 May 2016 |
| Dates of Further Written Submissions: |
25 June 2016 (the defendant)
30 June & 4 July 2016 (the plaintiffs)
|
| Date of Judgment: 17 July 2017 |
________________
C O R R I G E N D U M
________________
Pleasenote that the following corrections in the Judgment handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee on 17 July 2017:
1. Page 11, paragraph 35 and line J to K, “...the rent payable by Wai Choy…” should read as “...the rents collected from …”.
2. Page 12, paragraph 38 and line E, “...rental income of the Properties …” should read as “...monthly rent of the Properties…”.
3. Page 12, paragraph 39 and line H to I, “It was allegedly agreed…” should read as “It is allegedly agreed…”.
4. Page 25, paragraph 58 and line K to L, “...normal course of event.” should read as “...normal course of events”.
5. Page 26, paragraph 60(1) and line E to F, “...could not possibly change materially …” should read as “...could not possibly be changed materially …”.
6. Page 26, paragraph 60(2) and line I, “...the rental income…” should read as “...the rental incomes…”.
7. Page 26, paragraph 60(3) and line Q to R , “...more savings his financial detriment and let him be solely…” should read as “...more savings to his financial detriment and let himself be solely …”.
8. Page 30, paragraph 66 and line E, “The plaintiffs merely accepted this because of …” should read as “The plaintiffs accepted this merely because of …”.
9. Page 31, paragraph 71 and line E, the word “since” should be deleted.
10. Page 31, paragraph 71 and line H, “…by Ngan as family fund.” should read as “…by Ngan as the family fund.”.
11. Page 32, paragraph 76 and line L, “…for the rent income…” should read as “…for the rental income…”.
12. Page 33, paragraph 80 and line L to M, “…could not be set to have incurred…” should read as “…could not be said to have been incurred…”.
13. Page 33, paragraph 80 and line N, “…a family fund by…” should read as “…a family fund with…”.
14. Page 33, paragraph 81 and line R, “…all the income source and expenses…” should read as “…al the incomes and expenses…”.
Dated this 14th day of August 2017.
| |
(S.W. TAM)
Clerk to High Court Deputy Judge Kent Yee |
|