DR PAUL KI PING KI
REGISTRATION AND
HCAL 92/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO 92 OF 2012
____________
BETWEEN
and
_______________
J U D G M E N T
1. The facts of this case are similar to HCAL 90 of 2012. Though it has not been set out in the Form 86, the Applicant has also sought advice from the Nomination Advisory Committee as to his eligibility to stand for election in the forthcoming Legislative Council election.
2. For the same reasons as set out in the judgment handed down in HCAL 90 of 2012 (a copy of which shall be sent to the Applicant together with this judgment), this court refuses leave to the Applicant to apply for judicial review in the present case.
3. Like HCAL 90 of 2012, the court makes no order as to costs.
Applicant, in person
Mr Newton Chan, Ag Deputy Principal Government Counsel of the Department of Justice, for the Putative Respondent