|
FAMC No. 19 of 2014
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 19 OF 2014 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 188 OF 2009)
_____________________
Between:
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
MBUGUA JAMES WAIGWA |
Applicant |
_____________________
| Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ |
| Date of Hearing and Determination: 4 June 2014 |
____________________________
DETERMINATION
____________________________
Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:
1. This is the Determination of the Appeal Committee.
2. Application is made for leave to appeal on the basis that sufficiently important questions arise relating to the trial judge’s direction to the jury on the defence of duress regarding the immediacy of the threat and the opportunity to evade it. Mr Ross seeks to suggest that a crucial difference exists between a direction requiring the alleged threat of death or serious bodily injury to be one threatened to be carried out “immediately or almost immediately” as opposed to one to be carried out “imminently”.
3. We are not persuaded of the viability of the issue sought to be raised. In our view, the Court of Appeal’s reasons for dismissing the appeal are unassailable[1] and the applicant’s case is not reasonably arguable. The application must be dismissed.
| (R.A.V. Ribeiro) |
(Robert Tang) |
(Joseph Fok) |
| Permanent Judge |
Permanent Judge |
Permanent Judge |
Mr Phillip Ross, instructed by Christine M. Koo & Ip and assigned by the Legal Aid Department for the applicant
Ms Catherine Ko, ADPP (Ag) of the Department of Justice for the Respondent
[1] Yuen JA, Barnes and McWalters JJ, CACC 188/2009 (10 July 2013).
|