LI JING JENNY v. 顏耀松

[2018] HKCFI 131 · HCAL 822/2017

Court of First Instance25 January 2018

HCAL822/2017 LI JING JENNY v. 顏耀松

HCAL822/2017

[2018] HKCFI 131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 822 of 2017

BETWEEN
	李靜 Li Jing Jenny	Applicant
	and
	顏耀松	Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

	consideration of the documents only; or
	consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant or counsel [ ] in open court;

Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Chow dated 24 January 2018:

Leave to apply for judicial review dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant:

The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed on the ground the application is not reasonably arguable. The decision made by Master J Wong on 1 August 2017 is a judicial decision. If the Applicant is not satisfied with that decision, the proper way to challenge it is by way of an appeal and not by way of an application for judicial review.

Dated the 25^th day of January 2018.

(Clara Ng)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence

Notes for the Applicant:
If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);	Sent/Handed to the Applicant/ the Applicant’s solicitors on 25/01/2018 Li Jing Jenny 李靜 The Applicant	Sent/Handed to the Respondent/ the Respondent’s solicitors / such interested parties as may be directed by the Court / the interested parties’ solicitors on 25/01/2018 Nil
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and
c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

LI JING JENNY v. 顏耀松

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition