|
CAMP 301 /2023, [2025] HKCA 775
On appeal from [2023] HKCFI 1205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 301 OF 2023
(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 208 OF 2023)
________________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
Le Cong Manh |
Applicant |
| |
and |
|
| |
Torture Claims Appeal Board /
Non‑refoulement Claims Petition Office |
Putative Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
Director of Immigration |
Putative Interested Party |
________________________
| Before: |
Hon Kwan VP and Chow JA in Court |
| Date of Judgment: |
27 August 2025 |
____________________
J U D G M E N T
____________________
Hon Kwan VP (giving the Judgment of the Court):
1. This is the applicant’s Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal handed down on 25 October 2024 ([2024] HKCA 992). The Court of Appeal refused to grant extension of time to appeal against the decision of Deputy High Court Judge To dated 5 May 2023 dismissing the application for leave to seek judicial review against the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board concerning the applicant’s non-refoulement claim.
2. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of Practice Direction 2.1, the Registrar of Civil Appeals had directed that the applicant shall lodge written submissions on or before 20 January 2025. It was further directed that the Notice of Motion shall be determined on paper only without an oral hearing upon compliance with the said direction or the expiry of the time for complying with the direction. The applicant has not lodged any written submissions by the prescribed deadline. Having considered the papers of this case, we think it is appropriate to determine this application on paper and proceed to do so.
Grounds of appeal
3. In the Notice of Motion, the applicant repeated some of the grounds he relied on in his previous application before the Court of Appeal. He also filed an affirmation reiterating substantially the same points as raised in his affirmation filed in support of his previous application.
Analysis and disposition
4. Section 22(1)(b) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance (Cap 484) provides that an appeal shall lie to the Court of Final Appeal at the discretion of the Court of Appeal or the Court of Final Appeal, from any judgment of the Court of Appeal in any civil cause or matter, whether final or interlocutory, if, in the opinion of the Court of Appeal or the Court of Final Appeal, as the case may be, the question involved in the appeal is one which, by reason of its great general or public importance, or otherwise, ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for decision.
5. We have duly considered the applicant’s grounds in the appeal and given reasons for rejecting them in our judgment dated 25 October 2024. In the present application, the applicant failed to identify any particular mistakes in our decision, nor did he identify any question of great general or public importance which ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for determination in accordance with section 22(1)(b). There is also no basis for granting leave on the ‘or otherwise’ limb under section 22(1)(b).
6. For the above reasons, we dismiss the Notice of Motion filed on 6 January 2025.
(Susan Kwan)
Vice President |
(Anderson Chow)
Justice of Appeal |
The Applicant, acting in person
|