|
HCAP 8/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PROBATE ACTION NO. 8 OF 2013
____________
| |
IN THE ESTATE of Cheung Kee Yau (張記友)Alias Cheung Yau (張有) who passed away on 21st May 1981
|
| |
and
|
| |
IN THE MATTER of Order 76, rule 1 of the Rules of the High Court, Cap. 4
|
| |
and
|
| |
IN THE MATTER of section 33 of Probate and Administration Ordinance Cap. 10
|
____________
|
BETWEEN
|
| |
ZHANG XINQIANG (張新強), the Personal Representative of the estate of CHEUNG KEE YAU (張記友) alias CHEUNG YAU (張有) who passed away on 21st May 1981 |
Plaintiff |
| |
AND
|
|
| |
CHEUNG SHUI CHEUNG (張瑞祥) Executor of the Estate of CHEUNG YAU (張有), Hong Kong Identity Card Number B XXXXXX(X) who passed away on 5th September 2011 |
Defendant |
____________
| Before: Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee in Court |
| Date of Hearing: 14 – 17, 21 June 2016 |
| Date of Decision: 20 July 2017 |
______________________
C O R R I G E N D U M
______________________
Pleasenote that the following corrections in the Judgment handed down by Deputy High Court Judge Kent Yee on 20 July 2017:
1. Page 2, paragraph 1 and line H, “Cheung San (張有)” should read as “Cheung San (張生)”.
2. Page 2, paragraph 2 and line S, “include” should read as “includes”.
3. Page 8, paragraph 22 and line E, “D’s late father” should read as “P’s late father,”.
4. Page 11, paragraph 39 and line F, “the properties” should read as “the Properties”.
5. Page 11, paragraph 40 and line K, “commencing January 2012” should read as “commencing from January 2012”.
6. Page 13, paragraph 48 and lines C to D, “no evidence any damage and loss suffered at this stage” should read as “no evidence of any damage and loss suffered by the estate of D’s late father at this stage”.
7. Page 13, paragraph 50 and line I, “Zhang” should read as “SC Cheung”.
8. Page 13, paragraph 51 and line M, “Zhang” should read as “SC Cheung”.
9. Page 13, paragraph 52 and line P, “Zhang” should read as “SC Cheung”.
10. Page 15, paragraph 60 and line I to J, “ever” should be deleted.
11. Page 16, paragraph 63 and line D, “… I accept it existence …” should read as “… I accept its existence …”.
12. Page 16, paragraph 65 and line J, “this witnesses” should read as “these witnesses”.
13. Page 17, paragraph 71 and line Q, “it” should read as deleted.
14. Page 17, paragraph 71 and line S, “P’s late father also referred to …” should read as “P’s late father was also referred to …”.
15. Page 19, paragraph 74 (3) and line I, “pronunciation” should read as “pronunciations”.
16. Page 20, paragraph 74 (8) and line N, “any allegation of any interactions…” should read as “any allegation of his interactions …”.
17. Page 20, paragraph 74 (9) and line S to T, “He was a property owner …” should read as “He was an owner of landed properties …”.
18. Page 23, paragraph 74 (17) and line F, “D’s father” should read as “D’s late father”.
Dated this 24th day of July 2017.
| |
(S.W. TAM)
Clerk to High Court Deputy Judge Kent Yee |
|